Why decentralization in Indonesia is not good for reducing women fertility? Results from National Socio Economic Survey 2002-2014 and a case study

Tria Abrianty


This study examines the relationship between decentralization and women fertility in Indonesia. Mixed methods combining multilevel analyses of National Survey Data (Susenas) 2002-2014 and a case study of Empat Lawang district were used to examine the relationship and to elaborate why fiscal, administrative and political decentralization do not contribute for reducing women fertility in the country. The findings show that decentralization in Indonesia do not contribute for reducing women fertility. It reveals that lack of district fiscal capacity, lack of competencies of street level bureaucrats, and lack of district mayor political commitment in family planning challenges the promises of decentralization for reducing women fertility. The findings conclude that decentralization in the country may not an effective way for reducing and controlling women fertility. The government may revitalize decentralized family planning and population control programs by addressing those three challenges.


decentralization, women fertility, mixed method, Indonesia

Full Text:



Arun, A. & Ribot, J., “Analyzing Decentralization: A Framework with South

Asian and West African Cases”, Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 33 (1999), pp. 473-502.

Ballas, D., & Tranmer, M. (2011). Happy people or happy places? A multilevel modeling approach to the analysis of happiness and well-being. International Regional Science Review, 0160017611403737.

Baochang, G. 2007. China’s local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review 33 (1): 129-147.

Bardhan, P. & Dilip, M. 2012. Political Clientelism and Capture: Theory and Evidence from West Bengal, India (IGC Working Paper). International Growth Centre (IGC), London, UK.

Borck, R. 2007. Federalism, fertility and growth: CESifo working

paper, No. 2167

Bongaarts, J. 1978. A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility. Population and Development Review 4 : 105-132.

Bongaarts. J & G.R. Potter, (1983): Fertility, Biology and Behavior: An Analysis of the Proximate determinants, Academic press, New York.

Brueckner, J., Fiscal Decentralization in LDCs: The Effects of Local

Corruption and Tax Evasion, Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, (1999), mimeo.

Cammack, M. & Tim, BH. 2002. Regional variation in acceptance of Indonesia’s family planning program. Population Research and Policy Review: 565-585.

Cesare, M. & Vignoli, JR. 2006. Micro Analysis of Adolescent Fertility Determinants: The Case of Brazil and Colombia. Papeles de Poblacion No. 48: 93-123.

Chaurasia, A.R. 2011. Fertility Transition in Districts of India. Evidence from District Level Household Survey 2007-08. Studies in Population and Development.

Chernichovsky, D. & Meesook, OI. 1981. Regional aspects of family planning and fertility behavior in Indonesia. Washington, D.C. (1818 H St., N.W., Washington 20433): World Bank.

Collins, C.D., “Decentralization and the need for political and critical analysis”,

Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 48 (1989), pp.168-169.

Davis, K. & Black, J. (1956). “Social Structure and fertility an analytic framework” Economic Development and Cultural Change 4, No.4, July, pp.211-235

Dethier, J. (ed.), Governance, Decentralization and Reform in China,

India and Russia, Kluwer Academic Publishers and ZEF (2000).

Fesler, J.W. 1965. Approaches to the Understanding of Decentralization. The

Journal of Politics 27 (3): 536-566.

Goldstein, S. (1972). The influence of labour force Participation and Education

on fertility in Thailand, Population studies, Vol. 25, No. 3(nov) 419-36.

Grimm, M. , Sparrow, R & Tasciotti, L. 2014. Does Electrification Spur the Fertility Transition? Evidence from Indonesia. Demography, 52, 1773-1796.

Guzman, J. 2001, Diagnosis on sexual and reproductive health of adolescentsLatin America and the Caribbean. United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA) México.

Hayes, AC. 2010. The status of family planning and reproductive health in Indonesia, 2010. UNFPA – ICOMP Regional Consultation.

Hull, T.H. and Mosley, H. 2009. Revitalization of family planning in Indonesia. Bappenas, BKKBN and UNFPA.

Jeffery, R. & Jeffery, P. 1997. Population, Gender and Politics: Demographic Change in Rural North India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jones, G. & Adioetomo, SM. 2014. Population, Family Planning and Reproductive Health. Background document for 2014-19 RPJM.

Khaleghian, P., “Decentralization and Public Services: The Case of

Immunization”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2989, (2003), World Bank. Washington, D.C.

Khan, Q. 2014. Decentralization’s effects on education, health and agriculture outcomes, and on distribution: Evidence from Ethiopia. World Bank.

Lakshminarayanan, R. 2003. Decentralisation and its Implications for Reproductive Health: The Phillipines Experience. Reproductive Health Matters, Vol. 11 No. 21, pp. 96-107.

Lieberman, S. S. (2002). Decentralization and health in the Philippines and

Indonesia. An Interim Report, East Asia Human Development.

Litvack, J, Junaid, A. & Richard, B. 1998. Decentralization in

Developing Countries. The World Bank. Washington DC.

Litvack, J., & Seddon, J. (1999). Decentralization briefing notes. World

Bank Institute, Washington, DC.

Mills, A., “Decentralization and Accountability in the Health Sector from an

International Perspective: What are the Choices?”, Public Administration and Development, Vol.14 (1994), pp. 281-292.

Mize, LS. and Robey, B. (2006). A 35 Year Commitment to Family Planning in Indonesia: BKKBN and USAID’s Historic Partnership. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs.

Peabody JW, Rahman MO, Gertler PJ, Mann J, Farley DO, & Carter GM., Policy

and Health: Implications for Development in Asia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).

Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata 3 ed Volume 2: Categorical Responses Counts and Survival, Vol. 2. Tex: College Station.

Rahayu, R., Iwu, U. & McDonald, P. 2009. Contraceptive use among married women in Indonesia. International Conference on Family Planning: Research and Best Practices.

Randall, E. 2012. Family Planning Programmes Review.

Rindfuss, R. R., Brewster, K. L. & Kavee, A. L. 1996. Women, Work and Children: Behavioural and Attitudinal Change in the United States, Population and Development Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 457-482

Robalino, M. G., Picazo, O. F., & Voetberg, A. (2001). Does fiscal

decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence for cross country

analysis. World Bank Country Economics Department Series 2565.

The World Bank.

Robinson, W. S. (2009). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. International Journal of epidemiology, 38(2), 337-341.

Saunders, M. & Sharma, S. 2008. Mobilizing Political Support and Resources for Family Planning in a Decentralized Setting: Guidelines for Latin American and Caribbean Countries. Washington, DC: Futures Group, USAID | Health Policy Initiative, Task Order 1.

Schneider, A., 2003, Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement, Studies in Comparative International Development, Fall 2003, Vol. 38, No. 3

Schultz, T. P. 1994. Marital Status and Fertility in the United States: Welfare and Labor Mark

et Effects. The Journal of Human Resources, 29, 637-669.

Schultz, T. P. 2005. Fertility and Income. Center Discussion Paper No. 925. Yale University.

Seymour, R. & Turner, S. 2002. Otonomi Daerah: Indonesia’s Decentralization Experiment. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 4 (December 2002), 33-51.

Smith, B.C. 1985. Decentralization: The Teritorial Dimension ot the State.

George Allen & Unwin (Publishers). London.

Sujarwoto, S., & Tampubolon, G. (2015). Decentralisation and citizen happiness: A multilevel analysis of self-rated happiness in Indonesia. Journal of Happiness studies, 16(2), 455-475.

Sujarwoto, S. (2012). Political decentralization and local public services performance in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2(3), 55-84.

Sujarwoto. S. (2016). Does Democracy Make You Happy? Multilevel Analysis of Self-rated Happiness in Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan: Journal of Government and Politics, 7(1).

Sujarwoto, S., & Tampubolon, G. (2016). Spatial inequality and the Internet divide in Indonesia 2010–2012. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 602-616.

Sujarwoto, s. (2017). Geography and Communal Conflict in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 49(1), pp. 86-96

Uchimura, H. & Jutting, J.P. 2009. Fiscal Decentralization, Chinese Style: Good for Health Outcomes?. World Development Vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 1926-1934.

Weeks, J, R. 1988. The Demography of Islamic Nations, Population Bulletion, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp.5-53.

World Bank, World Development Report, Making services work for poor people, World Bank, Washington, DC, (2004).

Yamamura, E. 2011. Corruption and Fertility: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Economics and Econometrics Vol. 54, No.2, 2011 pp. 34-57.


  • There are currently no refbacks.