Why does fiscal decentralization negatively affect student dropout rates? Results from Indonesia’s National Socioeconomic Survey 2002-2014 and two case studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpas.2017.002.01.2Keywords:
fiscal decentralization, student dropout, mixed method, IndonesiaAbstract
The consequences of fiscal decentralization on basic education outcomes are always debatable. Yet, its consequences on student dropout rates remain questionable. In this paper, we examine why fiscal decentralization in Indonesia has not effectively reduced student dropout. Mixed method analyses combining the Indonesian National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas) 2002-2014 and two case studies in the districts of Sleman and Yogyakarta are used to explore the reasons for which fiscal decentralization has not reduced student dropout in Indonesia. Instead of reducing student dropout, we found that fiscal decentralization increases the risk of student dropout at the elementary school, transitional and junior secondary school levels. We found lack of fiscal capacity, inefficiency of educational budget allocation, and technical inefficiency in program implementation to be the main challenges that prevent district governments from effectively reducing student dropout.
References
Akai, N., Sakata, M., & Tanaka, R. (2007). Financial Decentralization and Educational Performance: Evidence from State-level Panel Data for the United States. Program on Housing and Urban Policy. Institute of Business and Economic Research: Berkeley.
Aslam, G., & Yilmaz, S. (2011). Impact of Decentralization Reforms in Pakistan on Service Delivery-An Empirical Study. Public Administration and Development, 31,159-171.
Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of Governance and Development. Journal of Economic Perspective. 16 (4),185-205.
Behrman, JR., Deolalikar, AB., & Soon, LY. (2002). Promoting Effective School Through Education Decentralization in Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Phillippines. Asian Development Bank: Manila.
BPS. (2015). Indonesia - Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional 2014 [Indonesia's national Socio-Economic Survey]. Indonesia's Central Bureau of Statistics: Jakarta.
Busemeyer, MR. (2008). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation on Education and Other Types of Spending. Swiss Political Science Review. 14 (3), 451-481.
Diaz-Serrano, L. & Meix-Llop, E. (2012). Do Fiscal and Political Decentralization Raise Students' Performance? A Cross-Country Analysis. IZA Discussion Paper Number 7622, 1-26.
Faguet, JP., & Sanchez, F. (2008). Decentralization's Effects on Educational Outcomes in Bolivia and Colombia. World Development. 36 (7), 1294-1316.
Freinkman, L., & Plekhanov, A. (2009). Fiscal Decentralization in Rentier Regions: Evidence from Russia. World Development. 37 (2), 503-512.
Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Schargrodsky, E. (2008). School Decentralization: Helping the Good Get Better, but Leaving the Poor Behind. Journal of Public Economics. 92 (1011), 2106-2120.
Inchauste, G. (2009). Decentralization in Bolivia: Has It Made a Difference? in Ahmad and Brosio, Does Decentralization Enhance Service Delivery and Poverty Reduction? Edwar Elgar: Glos.
Jukes, M., Jere, CM., & Pridmore, P. (2014). Evaluating the provision of flexible learning for children at risk of primary school dropout in Malawi. International Journal of Educational Development. 191-202.
Liu, F. (2004). Basic Education in China's Rural Areas: A Legal Obligation or an Individual Choice?. International Journal of Educational Development. 24, 5-21.
MoEC. (2015a). APK/APM PAUD, SD, SMP, dan SMK 2014/2015 (GER/NER All Levels of Schools 2014/2015). Indonesia's Ministry of Education and Culture: Jakarta.
MoEC. (2015b). Ikhtisar Data Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2014/2015 [Statistics of Education and Culture 2014/2015]. Indonesia's Ministry of Education and Culture: Jakarta.
MoF. 2016. Anggaran Pendidikan (Education Expenditures). Cited on April 6, 2016, from the Ministry of Finance website: http://www.anggaran.depkeu.go.id/dja/athumbs/apbn/PENDIDIKAN1.pdf
Nuh, M. (2013). Indonesia's Education Reformation. The Indonesian Journal of Leadership, Policy and World Affairs: Strategic Review. 3, 22-30.
Oates, WE. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature. 37 (3), 1120-1149.
Oates, W. 2005. Toward A Second Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance. 12, 349-373.
Peraita, C., & Pastor, M. (2000). The Primary School Dropout in Spain: The Influence of Family Background and Labor Market Conditions. Education Economics. 8 (2), 157.
Prud'homme, R. (1995). The Dangers of Decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer. 10 (2), 201-220.
Rajkumar, AS., & Swaroop, V. (2008). Public Spending and Outcomes: Does Governance Matter? Journal of Development Economics. 86, 96-111.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. SAGE: London.
Sujarwoto, S., & Tampubolon, G. (2015). Decentralisation and citizen happiness: A multilevel analysis of self-rated happiness in Indonesia. Journal of Happiness studies, 16(2), 455-475.
Sujarwoto, S. (2012). Political decentralization and local public services performance in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2(3), 55-84.
Sujarwoto. S. (2016). Does Democracy Make You Happy? Multilevel Analysis of Self-rated Happiness in Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan: Journal of Government and Politics, 7(1).
Sujarwoto, S., & Tampubolon, G. (2016). Spatial inequality and the Internet divide in Indonesia 2010–2012. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 602-616.
Sujarwoto, S. (2017). Why decentralization works and does not works? A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 1(3), 1-10.
Surbakti, P. (1995). Indonesia's National Socio-Economic Survey: A Continual Data Source For Analysis on Welfare Development. Central Bureau of Statistics: Jakarta.
Suryadarma, D., Jones, GW. 2013. Meeting the Education Challenge. in Education in Indonesia, edited by Suryadarma, D and Jones, GW. ISEAS: Singapore.
Tanzi, V. (1996). Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995.
Treisman, D. (2002). Decentralization and the Quality of Government. Unpublished. 1-47.
UNESCO. (2010). School Dropout: Patterns, Causes, Changes and Policies. Education for All Global Monitoring Report Background Paper No. 2011/ED/EFA/MRT/PI/08: 1-24.
Yi, H., Zhang, L., Luo, R., Shi, Y., Mo, D., Chen, X., Brinton, C & Rozelle, S. (2012). Dropping Out: Why Are Students Leaving Junior High in China's Poor Rural Areas? International Journal of Educational Development. 32, 555-563.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Statement
Authors who publish with JPAS agree to the following terms:
(1). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
(2). Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
(3). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Permissions and reuse
For authors
Authors may use their own articles for the following non-commercial purposes without asking our permission (and subject only to acknowledging first publication in JPAS and giving a full reference or web link, as appropriate).
(1). Posting a pdf of their own article on their own personal or institutional website, for which no charge for access is made.
(2). Making a reasonable number of copies for personal or non commercial professional use.
This includes the contributors own teaching purposes.
(1). Republishing part or all of the article in a book or other publication edited by the author (except for multiple contributions in the same book or publication, for which permission needs to be sought.
(2). Using individual figures or tables or extracts of text (up to 300 words) in other publications published by a third party.
(3). Using the article in a course pack or compilation (whether paper or electronic) in the authors institution. This does not apply if a commercial charge is made for the compilation or training programme.
For third parties
All articles published by JPAS are published by default as open access.
