Social responsibility policy implementation on upstream oil and gas industry (Study on Saka Indonesia Pangkah Limited in Gresik Regency East Java).

Endro Probo Crenantoro


Abstract. This study aims to describe the policy implementation of CSR program based on corporate vision and mandate of Oil and Natural Gas Law No. 22 of 2001. It also shows the community acceptance to the CSR programs that have been done. This study used qualitative method with descriptive research type. The unit of analysis taken is the corporate social responsibility program implemented by Saka Indonesia Pangkah Limited (SIPL) on the seven villages in Ujungpangkah and Manyar District, Gresik Regency. The result showed that the policy implementation of CSR through community development program in upstream oil and gas industry did not have standard operating procedure (SOP) yet that can be used as guidance by Production Sharing Contract (PSC) in carrying out social responsibility program in their operational area, even though it has strong legal basis in the form of Oil and Gas Law no. 22 of 2001. SIPL has implemented corporate social responsibility program based on Oil and Gas Law no. 22 of 2001 through various model approaches based on community need assessment referring on the concept of triple bottom line around the operation area. Thus, local community acceptance of the program is relatively acceptable. Finally, the main strategy of the CSR program run by SIPL aims to secure the company's operations.


Keywords: Policy Implementation, Corporate Social Responsibility, Community Development.


Policy Implementation; Corporate Social Responsibility; Community Development.

Full Text:



Buchholtz, A.K., Allen C.A., Matthew A.R. (1999). Beyond Resources: The Mediating Effect of Top Management Discretion and Values on Corporate Philanthropy. Business and Society, 38 (2), 167-187.

Corbin, Juliet, Strauss Anselm. (1988). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: SAGE Publications.

Cresswell, John. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. London: SAGE Publication.

Davis, G. (2002). Scenarios: Exploring Societal Problems. Paper was presented at IUCN Futures Dialogues, Johanesburg, South Africa.

Didik. S. Setyadi. (2017). Aspek Hukum Administrasi Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi. Jakarta: Cahaya Samudra Internusa.

Frynas, J. G. (2005). The False Developmental Promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Multinational Oil Companies. International Affairs 81(3), 581–598.

Grindle, Merilee S. (1980). Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Hohnen, Paul. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility An Implementation Guide for Business. Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

Ibrahim, Rustam. (2005). Bukan Sekedar Berbisnis: Keterlibatan Perusahaan Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Depok: Piramedia.

_____. (2007). Jalan (Masih) Panjang Menuju Masyarakat Sipil. Jakarta: Yappika.

Lance, Moir. (2001). What Do We Mean By Corporate Social Responsibility? Corporate Governance 1(2): 16–22. England: Cranfield School of Management Cranfield University.

Lawrence, Neuwmann. W. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. London: Allyn & Bacon.

Miles, Mattew B., Huberman, A. Michael. (2007). Analisis Data Kualitatif, Buku Sumber Tentang Metode Metode Baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Moon, Jeremy, Vogel, David. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility, Government, and Civil Society. (www.

Orlitzky, M., & John D.B. (2001). Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review. Business and Society, 40 (4), 369-396.

Prayogo, D.. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Justice dan Distributive Welfare dalam Industri Tambang dan Migas di Indonesia. Galang, Vol. 3 No. 3, 57-74.

Pudyantoro, A. Rinto. (2012). A to Z Bisnis Hulu MIGAS. Jakarta: Petromindo.

Pusat Pemberdayaan Komunitas Perkotaan (PUSDAKOTA). (2015). Kajian Kebutuhan Masyarakat dan Penyusunan Roadmap Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan SIPL Indonesia Pangkah Limited 2016-2018 di Wilayah Kecamatan Ujungpangkah dan Kecamatan Manyar, Kabupaten Gresik, Jawa Timur. Publikasi Pusdakota.

SIPL Pangkah Limited. (2015). Pedoman Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan SIPL Indonesia Pangkah Limited.Publikasi.

Sharma, S., Amy L.P., & Vredenburg, H. (1999). Corporate Environmental Responsiveness Strategies, The Importance of Issue Interpretation and Organizational Context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35 (1), 87-108.

Stone, B.A. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Investment. Business and Society, 40 (1), 112-117.

Subarsono. (2006). Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sujarwoto, S. (2012). Political decentralization and local public services performance in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2(3), 55-84.

Sujarwoto, S. (2017a). Geography and Communal Conflict in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 49(1), 89-96.

Sujarwoto, S., & Tampubolon, G. (2016). Spatial inequality and the Internet divide in Indonesia 2010–2012. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 602-616.

Utting, Peter. (2005). Corporate Responsibility and The Movement of Business. Development in Practice. 15(3-4): 375-388.

World Commission on Environment and Development – Bruntland Commission. (1987). Gathering A Body of Global Agreements. ( (Diakses 08 Mei 2016, Pukul 10:00 WIB)

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility.



  • There are currently no refbacks.