Factors That Affect User Satisfaction Of Electronic Learning Management Systems (ELMSs)


  • Riyadi Riyadi Universitas Brawijaya
  • Umar Nimran
  • Eko Ganis Sukoharsono
  • Muhammad Al Musadieq




ELMSs, subjective norms, satisfaction and perceived innovation


This research intends to explore a variety of factors that may affect the satisfaction use of ELMSs. Therefore, various factors have been tested empirically by using another model approach integrated into a single model. Other variables that are still reliable for further research without changing the construct of the indicators are subjective norms, usability, perceived innovation and satisfaction. Some relationships between variables that have significant influence include usability on perceived innovation, perceived innovation on satisfaction. One relationships between variables that have a small influence subjective norms on perceived innovation.


  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3)351-370.
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2000). Acceptance of internet applications services: the case of electronic Brokerages. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(1) 411–420.
  • Bhattacherjee, A., (2001). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance, Decision Support Systems, 2(1) 201–214.
  • Brown, T.J. (2002). Individual and technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web-based learning technologies in developing country. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9(5), 1-15.
  • Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology. Educause Quarterly, 2(1) 22-28.
  • Chau, Y. K. & Hu, P.J. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparation approach. Decision Sciences, 32(1)699-700.
  • DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success: a ten – year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4) 9 – 30.
  • Delone, W.H. & McLean, E.R., (1992). Information systems success. The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1) 60–95. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1976). Misconceptions about the Fishbein model: Reflections on a study by Songer-Nocks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(6), 579-584.
  • Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., & Chervany, N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2)183–213.
  • Keil, M., Beranek, P., & Konsynski, B. (1995). Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems, 13(1)75-91.
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, Inc.
  • Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & Cummings, J. (1996). Trait factors, state effects, and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1(3) 232-259.
  • Oliver, R.L., Bearden, W.O. (1985). Disconfirmation processes and consumer evaluations in product usage. Journal of Business Research, 13(1) 235–246
  • Rogers, E.M. and Floyd, S.F. (1971). Communication of Innovation. New York: Macmillan. Publishing.
  • Wulf, K. (1996). Training via the Internet: Where are We? Training and Development, 50(5).