Factors That Affect User Satisfaction Of Electronic Learning Management Systems (ELMSs)

Authors

  • Riyadi Riyadi Universitas Brawijaya
  • Umar Nimran
  • Eko Ganis Sukoharsono
  • Muhammad Al Musadieq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpas.2020.005.01.3

Keywords:

ELMSs, subjective norms, satisfaction and perceived innovation

Abstract

This research intends to explore a variety of factors that may affect the satisfaction use of ELMSs. Therefore, various factors have been tested empirically by using another model approach integrated into a single model. Other variables that are still reliable for further research without changing the construct of the indicators are subjective norms, usability, perceived innovation and satisfaction. Some relationships between variables that have significant influence include usability on perceived innovation, perceived innovation on satisfaction. One relationships between variables that have a small influence subjective norms on perceived innovation.

References

  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3)351-370.
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2000). Acceptance of internet applications services: the case of electronic Brokerages. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(1) 411–420.
  • Bhattacherjee, A., (2001). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance, Decision Support Systems, 2(1) 201–214.
  • Brown, T.J. (2002). Individual and technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web-based learning technologies in developing country. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9(5), 1-15.
  • Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology. Educause Quarterly, 2(1) 22-28.
  • Chau, Y. K. & Hu, P.J. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparation approach. Decision Sciences, 32(1)699-700.
  • DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success: a ten – year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4) 9 – 30.
  • Delone, W.H. & McLean, E.R., (1992). Information systems success. The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1) 60–95. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1976). Misconceptions about the Fishbein model: Reflections on a study by Songer-Nocks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(6), 579-584.
  • Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., & Chervany, N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2)183–213.
  • Keil, M., Beranek, P., & Konsynski, B. (1995). Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems, 13(1)75-91.
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, Inc.
  • Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & Cummings, J. (1996). Trait factors, state effects, and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1(3) 232-259.
  • Oliver, R.L., Bearden, W.O. (1985). Disconfirmation processes and consumer evaluations in product usage. Journal of Business Research, 13(1) 235–246
  • Rogers, E.M. and Floyd, S.F. (1971). Communication of Innovation. New York: Macmillan. Publishing.
  • Wulf, K. (1996). Training via the Internet: Where are We? Training and Development, 50(5).

Downloads

Published

2020-02-01

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

 

Copyright Statement

Authors who publish with JPAS agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Permissions and reuse

For authors

Authors may use their own articles for the following non-commercial purposes without asking our permission (and subject only to acknowledging first publication in JPAS and giving a full reference or web link, as appropriate).

  1. Posting a pdf of their own article on their own personal or institutional website, for which no charge for access is made.
  2. Making a reasonable number of copies for personal or non commercial professional use.

This includes the contributors own teaching purposes.

  1. Republishing part or all of the article in a book or other publication edited by the author (except for multiple contributions in the same book or publication, for which permission needs to be sought.
  2. Using individual figures or tables or extracts of text (up to 300 words) in other publications published by a third party.
  3. Using the article in a course pack or compilation (whether paper or electronic) in the authors institution. This does not apply if a commercial charge is made for the compilation or training programme.

 

For third parties

All Research articles published by JPAS are published by default as open access.